<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photography Your Own Way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rasmusrasmussen.com/2009/10/20/photography-your-own-way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rasmusrasmussen.com/2009/10/20/photography-your-own-way/</link>
	<description>The Writing Photographer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:48:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Libby</title>
		<link>http://rasmusrasmussen.com/2009/10/20/photography-your-own-way/comment-page-1/#comment-22755</link>
		<dc:creator>Libby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rasmusrasmussen.com/?p=768#comment-22755</guid>
		<description>I have another school of thought that helps me, at least, and that is to treat digital as if I was shooting film. I&#039;ll sometimes challenge myself by deliberately going out with a smaller memory card, or take out a camera with one prime lens (like a 35 or 50mm). I find it does help when I have severe creative block. It isn&#039;t for everyone, but I would rather return home with 100 really good shots than 1200 jpegs that are trash. I come from film and rangefinders, so such limitations don&#039;t bother me as much.

My problem when I went digital was that I think I was shooting too much and getting away from the core basics of what made a good photo. The lightbulb came on for me when on one photo forum, a guy bragged about shooting 2400 jpegs in one day, then posted two images saying &quot;these are the best&quot;. They were indeed garbage. That post just made me start thinking again.

On Photoshop - I can barely stand to look at &quot;cool&quot; Photoshop tutorials these days. There&#039;s just no substitute for good shooting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have another school of thought that helps me, at least, and that is to treat digital as if I was shooting film. I&#8217;ll sometimes challenge myself by deliberately going out with a smaller memory card, or take out a camera with one prime lens (like a 35 or 50mm). I find it does help when I have severe creative block. It isn&#8217;t for everyone, but I would rather return home with 100 really good shots than 1200 jpegs that are trash. I come from film and rangefinders, so such limitations don&#8217;t bother me as much.</p>
<p>My problem when I went digital was that I think I was shooting too much and getting away from the core basics of what made a good photo. The lightbulb came on for me when on one photo forum, a guy bragged about shooting 2400 jpegs in one day, then posted two images saying &#8220;these are the best&#8221;. They were indeed garbage. That post just made me start thinking again.</p>
<p>On Photoshop &#8211; I can barely stand to look at &#8220;cool&#8221; Photoshop tutorials these days. There&#8217;s just no substitute for good shooting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Seedy Side of Microstock - Rasmus Rasmussen dot com</title>
		<link>http://rasmusrasmussen.com/2009/10/20/photography-your-own-way/comment-page-1/#comment-22672</link>
		<dc:creator>The Seedy Side of Microstock - Rasmus Rasmussen dot com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rasmusrasmussen.com/?p=768#comment-22672</guid>
		<description>[...] second major mistake was a lack of connection between the content and the comment. The post where the comment had been left was actually not about microstock, and there was nothing in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] second major mistake was a lack of connection between the content and the comment. The post where the comment had been left was actually not about microstock, and there was nothing in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://rasmusrasmussen.com/2009/10/20/photography-your-own-way/comment-page-1/#comment-22246</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rasmusrasmussen.com/?p=768#comment-22246</guid>
		<description>Very well said, Ras.  Information overload sums it up.  I try to take bits and pieces, and remember a few things here in there.  In the end, you make it your own by playing around and developing your own &quot;eye&quot; like you said.  You will stress yourself out if you try and master everything you read about online, especially all at once.  I think that in time, we all end up trying a wide range of different styles, subjects, and techniques, but sometimes decide to focus on a limited range of those; either out of ability or personal preference.  

The stock mindset is definitely blinding.  I miss so many good shots because I see dollar signs when I&#039;m shooting.  I don&#039;t see things that might be dying to be captured, all of the time.  I wrote a blog post about this recently, comparing myself to a close friend of mine, who helped me come to this conclusion :) It&#039;s tough to be able to &quot;turn off&quot; stock.  Once you&#039;ve embedded it in your mindset, it just sticks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well said, Ras.  Information overload sums it up.  I try to take bits and pieces, and remember a few things here in there.  In the end, you make it your own by playing around and developing your own &#8220;eye&#8221; like you said.  You will stress yourself out if you try and master everything you read about online, especially all at once.  I think that in time, we all end up trying a wide range of different styles, subjects, and techniques, but sometimes decide to focus on a limited range of those; either out of ability or personal preference.  </p>
<p>The stock mindset is definitely blinding.  I miss so many good shots because I see dollar signs when I&#8217;m shooting.  I don&#8217;t see things that might be dying to be captured, all of the time.  I wrote a blog post about this recently, comparing myself to a close friend of mine, who helped me come to this conclusion :) It&#8217;s tough to be able to &#8220;turn off&#8221; stock.  Once you&#8217;ve embedded it in your mindset, it just sticks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahul Pathak</title>
		<link>http://rasmusrasmussen.com/2009/10/20/photography-your-own-way/comment-page-1/#comment-22211</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahul Pathak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 05:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rasmusrasmussen.com/?p=768#comment-22211</guid>
		<description>Great post Ras. It&#039;s from the heart and full of wisdom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Ras. It&#8217;s from the heart and full of wisdom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
